https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96608
--- Comment #5 from David Malcolm <dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4) > Do we ever transverse the hashtable that use symbolic_binding? If so using > the pointer value should almost never use really. Andrew: sorry, I'm having difficulty parsing and understanding your comment. Could you rephrase it please?
