https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90310
--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9) > Why? Those actually proved to be very efficient way to test the backends by > exposing details late and discovered many bugs in the backends where the RTL > in the instructions actually didn't match what the HW is doing. Without > that e.g. the PR90311 bug, which is very different from this, wouldn't be > discovered. I definitely agree with Jakub. Zdenek has been providing very useful bug reports for quite a long time, especially the wrong-code issues which are the most beneficial for us. I do prefer having 5 duplicates than missing a test-case that looks similar, but was ignored by reporter.
