https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88304
--- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> --- On Wed, 5 Dec 2018, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88304 > > --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > And lastly, what tree-nested.c does in cases which don't really fail is pretty > weird: > module pr88304 > implicit none > contains > subroutine f1 (x) > integer, intent(out) :: x > x = 5 > end subroutine f1 > subroutine f2 () > integer :: x > call f3 > if (x .ne. 5) stop 1 > contains > subroutine f3 > call f1 (x) > end subroutine f3 > end subroutine f2 > end module pr88304 > > The original > x = {CLOBBER}; > is replaced here with: > integer(kind=4) D.3863; > > D.3863 = {CLOBBER}; > CHAIN.3->x = D.3863; > I guess we want to drop those from the IL instead as well. Heh, yes. Or convert them to D.3863 = CHAIN.3->x; *D.3863 = {CLOBBER}; but not sure if those will ever end up being useful.