https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78468
--- Comment #35 from Dominik Vogt <vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com> --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #34) > > I still disagree with reverting the patch. There was plenty of time to > > identify and fix affected backends instead of doing nothing for half five > > months and then claiming that the patch is potentially too disruptive at > > this point in the release cycle. > > That was your job though and apparently you didn't do it. Don't be silly. I've fixed all regresseions that have shown up, except the one on Sparc because you refused to accept changes to the Sparc backend. It's all documented in this discussion thread, so please stop inventing excuses to put the blame on others.
