https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78468
--- Comment #34 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > I still disagree with reverting the patch. There was plenty of time to > identify and fix affected backends instead of doing nothing for half five > months and then claiming that the patch is potentially too disruptive at > this point in the release cycle. That was your job though and apparently you didn't do it.
