https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67773
--- Comment #6 from Adam Wenocur <awenocur at aol dot com> --- Whoops! Sorry about the malformed double-post. Another way of explaining the problem is that the compiler appears to be suppressing the wrong destructor call. Since this is a move and not a copy, or in C++03 it's a copy elision, it should be suppressing the destructor call on the temporary variable. It's not doing this though; it's suppressing the first destructor call on the named variable instead. When I get a chance, I'll build a GCC for testing purposes. What version would be appropriate in this case? Is 4.8.5 supported?
