https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67773

--- Comment #5 from Adam Wenocur <awenocur at aol dot com> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
> Oh, are you expecting this:
> 
>   a_thing = demo(demo::second);
> 
> to have the same behaviour as this:
> 
>   a_thing.~demo();
>   new(&a_thing) demo(demo::second);
> 
> ?
> 
> That's not how C++ works.

I don't expect the same behavior, however I expect the same end result:

for the destructor to be called on to be called on the named variable before
the move, then for it to be called on the temporary object.

Reply via email to