https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65456
--- Comment #25 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
> --- Comment #24 from Bill Schmidt <wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> No, I don't think so. The same change was made in GCC 4.9, and it didn't
> cause
> it to XPASS there (looking at gcc-testresults). Also, my change restricted
> the
> number of cases for which a test is expected to fail, rather than adding
> cases,
> so if it XPASSes now, it should have XPASSed prior to the change.
>
> Have you bisected to see which revision corresponds to the regression?
Not yet: those sparc boxes are slow, and it will take ages. I'll check
if I can reproduce in a cross compiler.
Rainer
