https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65456
--- Comment #24 from Bill Schmidt <wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org> --- No, I don't think so. The same change was made in GCC 4.9, and it didn't cause it to XPASS there (looking at gcc-testresults). Also, my change restricted the number of cases for which a test is expected to fail, rather than adding cases, so if it XPASSes now, it should have XPASSed prior to the change. Have you bisected to see which revision corresponds to the regression?
