https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59016
--- Comment #10 from drikosev at otenet dot gr --- Created attachment 35226 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35226&action=edit altered patch for the regressions reported in comment 9 Hi Dominiq, In a slightly altered patched, I've added a precondition which examines first the locus of the current symbol and finally the error reported seems to comply with the testsuites. I've run the 4 tests one by one with the debugger; I don't know what is exactly the meaning of the phrase "(test for excess errors)" or why each test appears twice in your list. If I miss any important details please tell me. Regards, Ev. Drikos
