https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65024
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> --- > > AFAICT the ICE for the original test is as old as the first implementation > > of unlimited polymorphism. > > In that case, should we remove the '[4.9/5 Regression]' tag from the summary > title? Please don't do that. (1) The ICE for the reduced test in comment 2 is a regression. Leave some time to Janus to look at the problem: > > > The ICE for the reduced test in comment 2 [...] > > Started at r207986. > > Huh, that was me committing a patch for PR 60234. Guess I should take a look > (but will probably not manage to do so before the weekend ...) (2) There are presently more than 800 open PRs, but less than 40 regressions that can be fixed during stage 4.
