https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64583

--- Comment #7 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #6)
> In the testcase the symbol in question seems to be optimized out because it
> is comdat and unused. That looks valid.  Does possibly fix for PR64612 help
> here?

Martin has got a more detailed linker error: http://pastebin.com/wbcKdpVA

So _ZN5blink10FontFamilyD1Ev seems to be the culprit.

Will test the PR64612 patch tomorrow.

Reply via email to