https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64583

Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |WAITING
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2015-01-15
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
In the testcase the symbol in question seems to be optimized out because it is
comdat and unused. That looks valid.  Does possibly fix for PR64612 help here?

Reply via email to