http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16093
--- Comment #7 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #6) > Honestly I didn't pay attention to the second testcase and didn't consider > the first issue serious enough ;) Anyway, let's keep this open for now, > thanks. The first issue is just a "nice-to-have" thing, but not very important. As for the second issue, it is already opened in a more general way at PR52277.