http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16093
Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #5 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #4)
> In my opinion we are currently doing pretty well: the columns are ok; we
> handle templates with no excess error messages and we specifically talk
> about 'template type' for those. Comparing also to current clang, I think
> this bug could be closed.
It has improved a lot yes. But I think the point of the original reporter is
that g++ should make a difference between the case where 'foo' has not been
declared in the current context or the case where 'var' has been declared but
it is not a type. This way G++ could do *better* than clang. ;-)
For the second testcase, we have also improved, since we print the full
namespace, but clang has the helpful:
test.cc:27:5: error: no type named 'foo' in namespace 'n1::n2'; did you mean
'n3::n2::foo'?
But this is now a minor enhancement, not really a bug.
