http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55073
--- Comment #4 from Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-11-30 09:58:38 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > Hello Richard > > I updated my working copy of gcc to rev 193943, rebuilt the compiler, rebuilt > the testcase I originally attached to this bug report, and I am still getting > different results depending on whether the -fno-schedule-insns option is used > or not. Furthermore, neither of the two sets of return values I get match the > ones you use in your test case for the failure detection. On what HW and with > which compile options did you test this and come to these values? > > I'd be glad to run more tests if you need me to. > > Shall I reopen this bug? > > Best Regards, > Eric Well it would help if you told me what output you were expecting, rather than leaving me to try and figure it out. I ran the testcase supplied with various optimization levels on a cortex-A15 and got identical results in all cases once the patch had been applied.
