http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55073
--- Comment #3 from Eric Batut <eric.batut at allegorithmic dot com> 2012-11-30 09:52:19 UTC --- Hello Richard I updated my working copy of gcc to rev 193943, rebuilt the compiler, rebuilt the testcase I originally attached to this bug report, and I am still getting different results depending on whether the -fno-schedule-insns option is used or not. Furthermore, neither of the two sets of return values I get match the ones you use in your test case for the failure detection. On what HW and with which compile options did you test this and come to these values? I'd be glad to run more tests if you need me to. Shall I reopen this bug? Best Regards, Eric
