http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55397
--- Comment #5 from Konstantin Serebryany <konstantin.s.serebryany at gmail dot com> 2012-11-20 05:46:06 UTC --- Then it should probably *not* be named _ADDRESS_SANITIZER (imagine a user trying to understand why ADDRESS_SANITIZER works for him with clang, where he added -DADDRESS_SANITIZER=1 manually, and dpoes not work with gcc where he saw the documentation saying about _ADDRESS_SANITIZER) Maybe something with GCC in the name? _GCC_ADDRESS_SANITIZER?
