http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55397
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-11-20 05:23:29 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Note that this will be incompatible with what clang uses > (http://clang.llvm.org/docs/AddressSanitizer.html#has_feature) > Clang will never use a CPP macro (I've lost this battle a year ago). > > Just FYI. I don't know how much compatibility we want and can achieve. has feature will most likely not be implemented in GCC so CPP macro is correct for GCC. If clang wants to have a non-standard way of doing CPP macro for features, that is up to them.
