http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51180
Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-12-01
19:41:33 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> This is somewhat related to PR c++/51239. I think at some point
> during the substituting of t2 in to m, we should leave t2<B...>
> "unbound" instead of trying to substitute B... into it.
I'm surprised that it doesn't just work already; writing t2<B...> already
works, doing the substitution ought to work the same way.
