http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51180
Dodji Seketeli <dodji at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed| |2011-12-01
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Dodji Seketeli <dodji at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-12-01
19:25:02 UTC ---
This is somewhat related to PR c++/51239. I think at some point
during the substituting of t2 in to m, we should leave t2<B...>
"unbound" instead of trying to substitute B... into it.
The proper substituting of t2<B...> would happen later when B... has a
proper matching argument pack.
I am working on a joint patch for this and PR c++/51239.
