http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49638

janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot       |janus at gcc dot gnu.org
                   |gnu.org                     |

--- Comment #15 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-04 21:16:48 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> > That can be done quicker as:
> >    if (e1->symtree->n.sym->name == e1->symtree->n.sym->name)
> > 
> 
> Hopefully, the above is optimized away by the c compiler.
> I suspect that one of the 'e1' should be an 'e2'.

Yes, of course (noted already in comment #11).

Also: Taking this one.

Reply via email to