http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49638
--- Comment #13 from Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-08-04 11:16:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #10) > > (In reply to comment #9) > > > + if (strcmp (e1->symtree->n.sym->name, e1->symtree->n.sym->name) != > > > 0) > > > > That can be done quicker as: > > if (e1->symtree->n.sym->name == e1->symtree->n.sym->name) > > > > well, not in the general case - but as long as "gfc_get_string" was used to > > obtain the value. > > Can we be sure that this is the case? With the strcmp we should be on the safe > side. > If it's not the case there is a bug. ;-)
