http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49791
--- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-07-20 21:53:42 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165979 > PR libgfortran/46010 The problem is that "dtp->u.p.ionml->touched" becomes 0 (initially it is 1) such that one stops the expanded_read. It seems as if the issue of this PR is solved - without causing test-suite regressions -, if one removes that check while keeping the line for BT_DERIVED. (I am currently testing the whole test suite; however, all namelist*.* tests already succeeded.) Jerry what do you think? I have to admit that I have not the slightest idea what ionml->touched does - thus, I cannot come up of a possibly failing namelist. --- a/libgfortran/io/list_read.c +++ b/libgfortran/io/list_read.c @@ -2213,7 +2213,6 @@ nml_parse_qualifier (st_parameter_dt *dtp, descriptor_dimension *ad, do not allow excess data to be processed. */ if (is_array_section == 1 || !(compile_options.allow_std & GFC_STD_GNU) - || !dtp->u.p.ionml->touched || dtp->u.p.ionml->type == BT_DERIVED) ls[dim].end = ls[dim].start; else
