http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49791
--- Comment #6 from Elliott Sales de Andrade <quantum.analyst at gmail dot com> 2011-07-20 21:09:20 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > If the bug reporter can, I think he should convert all the input files to the > Fortran 90 syntax of namelists. However, one needs to be careful to not > inadvertently to change the meaning (e.g. remove the wrong "(1)") and it might > affect many files. > I can change the test suite, but since we also use the Intel and PGI compilers, I wouldn't be able to guarantee other people won't get confused with this. (In reply to comment #4) > > It's an undocumented bug^H^H^H extension. > > The undocumented extension cannot be flagged by any combination of > -Wall, -Wextra, -fcheck=all, -Wsurprising and/or -std=f95,f2003,f2008. Perhaps I am misreading it, but I thought it was actually documented at http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gfortran/Extensions-to-namelist.html > Expanded namelist reads are permitted. This causes an error if -std=f95 is > used. In the following example, the first element of the array will be given > the value 0.00 and the two succeeding elements will be given the values 1.00 > and 2.00. > > &MYNML > X(1,1) = 0.00 , 1.00 , 2.00 > / >
