http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49572
--- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> 2011-06-30 10:42:21 UTC --- On Thu, 30 Jun 2011, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49572 > > --- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-06-30 > 10:30:28 UTC --- > > For loads yes. > > OK, what's the right predicate to use on the RHS here? !is_gimple_val? Do we ever end up with stores in that function? I doubt so given that expr->ops.single.rhs is set to RHS1. ISTR DOM enters a load for a store operation. So just unconditionally use the type of rhs1.
