http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49572
Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2011.06.29 06:56:29
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-06-29
06:56:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Nope, not on 4.6 either; it's just 4.4. Is it possible that the patch was
> backported too far?
The bug was present on the 4.4 branch and is fixed by the patch so the first
answer is no. Now some optimizations might rely on it. Present on x86 too.
