http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49112
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |janus at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
--- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-20 19:55:54 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> It can be fixed by this partial revert:
>
> ===================================================================
> --- gcc/fortran/resolve.c (revision 174415)
> +++ gcc/fortran/resolve.c (working copy)
> @@ -964,9 +964,6 @@ resolve_structure_cons (gfc_expr *expr, int init)
>
> t = SUCCESS;
>
> - if (expr->ts.type == BT_DERIVED)
> - resolve_symbol (expr->ts.u.derived);
> -
> cons = gfc_constructor_first (expr->value.constructor);
> /* A constructor may have references if it is the result of substituting a
> parameter variable. In this case we just pull out the component we
Unfortunately this patchlet seems to induce the following testsuite
regressions:
FAIL: gfortran.dg/func_assign_3.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/func_result_6.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/typebound_call_7.f03 -O (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/typebound_call_8.f03 -O (test for excess errors)
The patch in comment #9, however, seems to be clean.
