http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47940

--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-01 
12:32:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> "abstract virtual" - the class is abstract, the function is pure virtual.

I forgot I already changed that ;)
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-05/msg00437.html

Reply via email to