http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47940
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |diagnostic
Summary|can call a pure virtual |warn about calls to a pure
|from a |virtual from a
|constructor/destructor |constructor/destructor
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-01
12:19:40 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> If it was a direct call, there would be a linker error.
Not if the pure virtual has a definition, and not with all compilers.
G++ does warn about that case though.
None of the compilers I tested issued a diagnostic about indirectly making a
virtual call to a pure virtual function.
