http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47836
--- Comment #10 from th.r.klein at web dot de 2011-02-28 19:52:12 UTC --- If you can't imagine how to get a usable C++ compiler without libstdc++-v3 (and libc), please stop wasting your time in thinking about it. Here is no C++ problem at all. If it helps you, think the C compiler will be build with --enable-languages=c switch instead. Assume there will be no libc for the target architecture. Especially there is no malloc or free, nor any kind of the other useful toys. How ever, there will be functions doing similar things, but with different names and different interfaces. In this situation it is currently impossible for gcc to build the target-zlib or the target-libiberty library. Again, in 4.6 the generation of those libraries is now enabled per default (previously disabled per default). On most targets this might make sense, but there must be a way to disable the generation of those libraries, too. If you think there is already such a mechanism, then this mechanism did not work.
