http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46362
--- Comment #12 from Dave Korn <davek at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-09 23:08:40 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #10) > > I wouldn't worry about bool for this code. > > > > I'm not sure that int64_t is sure to be defined. uint64_t is in the > > configure > > script and so will be defined for sure. > > I'll add ... AC_TYPE_INT64_T just to be on the safe side. Can't imagine a system that has only unsigned 64-bit ints!
