http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46362
--- Comment #11 from Dave Korn <davek at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-09 23:07:45 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > I wouldn't worry about bool for this code. > > I'm not sure that int64_t is sure to be defined. uint64_t is in the configure > script and so will be defined for sure. I'll add > This is going to slightly change the file name since the offset will be > printed > with at least 9 characters. Is that going to be OK? Hmm, I can't swear. As far as I know, it's only used with a "%li" format in lto-object.c. Given that it's always been /possible/ for it to have >8 chars, it /ought/ to be ok... but maybe I'll make it check if the high part is zero and not print it nor pad the low part in that case.
