http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45841
--- Comment #10 from Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-09-30 22:55:20 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > I somewhat doubt this will fix it, but if it's not more effort, then please > use > the patch for an additional test run. Thank you, testing in progress. The least effort was to just throw it to the full build and test cycle, so it'll be a few hours, possibly interfered by some Z's. > If it is a fix, then something is wrong > with lseek(). That seems like an important clue, thanks.
