http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45786
--- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu> 2010-09-25 05:57:30 UTC --- On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 03:00:37AM +0000, sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu wrote: > On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 12:16:53AM +0000, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > > > Interesting**3. If you simply remove the private > > and public statement then everything works as one > > would expect. > > > > And finally, an even more interesting bug. > > Change the interface statement to > > > > interface operator(.eq.) > > module procedure eq_foo > > end interface operator(==) > > I have a patch that appears to fix this one. > I think it is more of a bandaid than a proper fix > in that I think .eq. should be simply substituted > with == on the input stream during parsing. > The patch was committed as svn-commit.tmp: 8 lines, 286 characters. Sending gcc/fortran/ChangeLog Sending gcc/fortran/interface.c Sending gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog Adding gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/operator_c1202.f90 Transmitting file data .... Committed revision 164616. -- Configure bugmail: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
