http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45786
--- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu> 2010-09-25 03:00:24 UTC --- On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 12:16:53AM +0000, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > Interesting**3. If you simply remove the private > and public statement then everything works as one > would expect. > > And finally, an even more interesting bug. > Change the interface statement to > > interface operator(.eq.) > module procedure eq_foo > end interface operator(==) I have a patch that appears to fix this one. I think it is more of a bandaid than a proper fix in that I think .eq. should be simply substituted with == on the input stream during parsing. -- Configure bugmail: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
