------- Comment #32 from rogerio at rilhas dot com 2010-08-11 21:12 -------
(In reply to comment #31)
> >Didn't you understand the equivalent code would be:
> No, as the variables act the same if they are automatic variables or
> arguments.
> there is no different between the two. That has been my point from the
> beginning.
Wrong again. The cdecl definition is for parameters, there is no such thing for
automatic variables. So I can expect a given packing of arguments in a
cdecl-compliant compiler, and I can expect no such thing from automatic
variables.
Can you backup your claim? (I'm not really interested, just to let you know
that you missed a critical aspect again)
> I think it is time for me to end my part and say please follow up to the C
> standards news group as we are going in circles as a misunderstanding about
> ABI
> and how arguments are passed have no concern to what the C standard says about
> variables (automatic and arguments) and the size of an array for an address of
> one.
Yes, I agree that is better as you don't backup anything you say. You didn't
even bother to answer to a) and b) of my comment 27 (and you woldn't,
obviously, as you dismiss cdecl as an important part to this discussion). I can
only assume that that is because you simply can't, since you so cleverly
avoided answering the questions I placed there which would surely settle the
matter.
Anyway, I found a workaround that makes GCC behave properly so I got my code
running again. So you can leave the bug as is and it won't bother me anymore.
--
rogerio at rilhas dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|blocker |normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45249
