------- Comment #28 from rogerio at rilhas dot com 2010-08-11 20:07 ------- (In reply to comment #23) > First off I already mentioned what is undefined in this example in comment > #11. > The part of the standard that mentions about arrays. And how the address of > a > scalar is considered an array of size 1. I don't have the standard in front > of > me right now but those are what I remember from the standard.
Right. And I clearly explained in my comment #14 why you were wrong. Getting back to comment #11 so that we can run around in circles brings no improvement to this conversation, and you will just keep on being wrong, even if you had the standard in front of you, because your example in comment #11 does not correspond to the code I'm doing. My comment #14 explains what is the correct code for comparison. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45249
