------- Comment #5 from sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it 2010-07-13 09:24 ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Carry on the test case from PR 43945 comment 19 (cf. also PR 43945 comment 30, > 31, 32): > > > As the test case in comment 3 (attachment 21184 [edit]) is different from the > one of > PR 43945 comment 19, I add the latter as well: > > Attachment 20927 [edit] compiles with both crayftn and gfortran, but the > run-time > result is different; while crayftn has > > Allocated COO succesfully, should now set components > STOP > > with gfortran the result is > > Error: Missing ovverriding impl for allocate in class COO >
The two are intended to generate the same error, i.e. resolution to the base specific instead of the overriding one. As far as I can tell the error is caused by having a binding-name => specific-name in the base version; if the base version has just a name (thus binding==specific) the resolution mechanism works. Salvatore -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42385
