------- Comment #2 from sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it 2010-07-12 14:58 ------- (In reply to comment #1) Hi Damian, This is related to the original test case for PR 43945; that test case is now going to handle the dynamic side of it, but the problem with generics exists with normal typebound procedures as well. It seems to be related to the binding_name => specific_name thing, operators are not really relevant.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42385
