------- Comment #11 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-07-04 01:46 ------- Subject: Re: -Werror=edantic
On Fri, 2 Jul 2010, manu at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > Let's restrict to -pedantic first. It is the only warning flag that doesn't > start with "-W". This breaks some code that expects that every warning flag > starts with -W. I want to introduce -Wpedantic as an alias. You do not like > the > name. What is your suggestion? I do not object to -Wpedantic. I object to -Wpedantic-default or other variants involving "pedantic" for diagnostics currently enabled by default. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44774
