------- Comment #7 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-02 10:56 ------- Why? All of them do, except -pedantic. I don't see any reason for -pedantic being exceptional. Or can I start proposing warnings options that do not start with -W?
Should we introduce a special case for pedantic (code and documentation) for -Werror= and for -Wno-error= and for -Wno-? I can start opening PRs for the missing special cases. We would also need to introduce (and handle specially) -no-pedantic and -no-pedantic-errors. All the above is free if we just make -Wpedantic an alias for -pedantic. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44774
