------- Comment #23 from davek at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-05-12 22:20 -------
(In reply to comment #22)
> Hm, I'm not able to run thread_test.c and thread_leak_test.c tests using "make
> -k check", so otherwise deadly trivial patch can't be fully tested.
> 

Well I can't approve it but I think it's as close to "obvious" as anything
gets.  If you send it to libjava-patches (and cc the upstream list for
boehm-gc: <g...@napali.hpl.hp.com> - we're trying to avoid any divergence), I
can't imagine anyone would object.  Thanks for helping track this down :)


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42811

Reply via email to