------- Comment #23 from davek at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-12 22:20 ------- (In reply to comment #22) > Hm, I'm not able to run thread_test.c and thread_leak_test.c tests using "make > -k check", so otherwise deadly trivial patch can't be fully tested. >
Well I can't approve it but I think it's as close to "obvious" as anything gets. If you send it to libjava-patches (and cc the upstream list for boehm-gc: <g...@napali.hpl.hp.com> - we're trying to avoid any divergence), I can't imagine anyone would object. Thanks for helping track this down :) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42811