------- Comment #27 from rguenther at suse dot de 2009-12-20 13:48 ------- Subject: Re: [4.5 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/where_2.f90 execution, -O3 -g with -m64
On Sun, 20 Dec 2009, irar at il dot ibm dot com wrote: > ------- Comment #26 from irar at il dot ibm dot com 2009-12-20 13:46 ------- > I think the problem is in alignment. We force alignment of temp.6 and temp.20 > - > the arrays of relevant comaprison results - even though we don't vectorize > their loop. The decision whether we can force alignment is made in > vect_can_force_dr_alignment_p(), and it seems that the only target specific > query there is comparison with MAX_STACK_ALIGNMENT. That sounds odd. If we don't make use of the extra alignment how should it affect generated code or even correctness? Richard. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41082