------- Comment #17 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-12-15 14:15 -------
> But in comment #5 you wrote that it passes with the print, right? So, this
> dump
> contains correct or incorrect code?
The dump for 4.5 is from the incorrect code. The behavior of this bug has
change over time, it started for -m64 only with/without print, then it failes
also with -m32, finally at revision 155239 it fails with the print:
...
print *, temp
if (any (temp .ne. (/100, 100, 100, 210, 210, 210, 310, 310, 337, 337/))) &
call abort
end program
[karma] f90/bug% gfc -O3 where_2.f90
[karma] f90/bug% a.out
100 100 100 210 210 210
310 337 310 310
Abort
[karma] f90/bug% gfc -m64 -O3 where_2.f90
[karma] f90/bug% a.out
100 100 100 210 210 210
310 337 310 337
Abort
Note that the content of temp change with the mode.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41082
