------- Comment #23 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2009-10-21 10:48 ------- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #7) > > With binutils from the 2.20 branch, and gcc from the 4.4 branch, including > > Jakub's patch, and excluding the current workaround from Ramana, I get: > > > > IIUC and to make things explicit, the work-around is needed for any binutils > prior to the 2.20 branch until the backport is done. If the backport is > committed we should pull out my work around as well.
The backport has been committed now, so your PR41533 workaround should not be needed any more. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40521