------- Comment #23 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se  2009-10-21 10:48 -------
(In reply to comment #8)
> (In reply to comment #7)
> > With binutils from the 2.20 branch, and gcc from the 4.4 branch, including
> > Jakub's patch, and excluding the current workaround from Ramana, I get:
> > 
> 
> IIUC and to make things explicit, the work-around is needed for any binutils
> prior to the 2.20 branch until the backport is done. If the backport is
> committed we should pull out my work around as well. 

The backport has been committed now, so your PR41533 workaround should not be
needed any more.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40521

Reply via email to