------- Comment #8 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-10-08 15:36 -------
(In reply to comment #7)
> With binutils from the 2.20 branch, and gcc from the 4.4 branch, including
> Jakub's patch, and excluding the current workaround from Ramana, I get:
> 

IIUC and to make things explicit, the work-around is needed for any binutils
prior to the 2.20 branch until the backport is done. If the backport is
committed we should pull out my work around as well. 


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40521

Reply via email to