------- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-16 02:47 ------- I think I know how to fix this. I'll note that James' clever programs may be invoking processor defined behavior due to the multiplication by 0 in his specification statements. See 7.1.8.1.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38822
