------- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-16 00:55 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Before closing, please also check the two longer cases: > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/msg/97c3ce6e98432ae9 > and the older (partially incorrect?) one at > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/msg/c71f697c3e21e3f2 >
Well, both programs compile with my patch that allows 2.e0**2.e0 to compile. troutmask:sgk[220] gfc4x -o z j2.f90 troutmask:sgk[221] ./z T T troutmask:sgk[222] gfc4x -o z -std=f95 j1.f90 troutmask:sgk[223] ./z T T I haven't unraveled James' argument that the correct answer is T F. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38822
