------- Comment #26 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu 2008-10-31 22:14 ------- Subject: Re: gfortran error and ICE at automatic type conversion with transfer intrinsic
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 09:43:13PM -0000, burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > > I'll also note that the diagnostic information tells you how to > > disable the range checking. > > That is actually not true: For ARITH_NAN and ARITH_UNDERFLOW there is no > -fno-range-check mentioned - only for ARITH_OVERFLOW is. I don't use -fno-range-check unless I'm debugging some PR, so I forgot the details. ARITH_UNDERFLOW doesn't require any special handling (ie., they are set to zero). We could extend -fno-range-check to allow the conversion of a REAL NaN to a DOUBLE PRECISION NaN. I'm not too excited by that idea. > Question: Is this bug now fixed or remains something else to do? (Besides > mentioning -fno-range-check in the error message and implementing F2003's IEEE > functions.) Personally, I think the bug is fixed, and this PR can be closed. I thought FX had opened a PR for the IEEE module, but a quick scan did not find it. I guess it doesn't make much sense opening a PR for every unimplemented F2003 feature. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37930
